Crucianize

Category: Genealogy

  • Half Cousins galore!

    Half Cousins galore!

    This month has actually been pretty active for DNA cousins, I had one of my cousins pop up, they are actually my half 1st cousin but in my family we don’t really use “half”. I also had the child of one of my cousins pop up, again they are half relation but we don’t use those terms.

    Itr is actually interesting to see the shared relatives between both of my cousins. I was expecting to see just relatives of my grandfather but sprinkled in there were relatives from my grandmother’s side and my father’s paternal and maternal side!

    This is interesting to me because my grandparents were from different countries. My paternal grandfather was from Saint-Barthélemy in the French caribbean, my paternal grandmother was from St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands and my maternal grandparents were from Dominica.

    I’m trying not to get ahead of myself while speculating on the relationships of all these dna relatives and what it means that they show up in my shared relatives in common with my cousins. It is entirely possible that I am related to this person on their paternal side and my cousin is related to them via their maternal side. I have no idea how I’m actually going to prove these lines though, Dominica genealogy is the most frustrating one I have ever had to deal with, if I could find my way to a family history center and view the records on, FamilySearch I would be so happy but I have no way to gain access to one. I hope that the records for Saint George parish will be made available one day and I’m able to search whenever I want.

    Here is my Half first cousin, their parent is my mother’s half sibling. We share 7% of our DNA, 485 cM across 22 segments. My cousin and our aunt who is my full aunt share 1031 cM across 34 segments while I share 1808 cM across 60 segments. My cousin actually share a little more DNA with my brother than I do and I don’t like it lol, my brother actually shares 594 cM across 20 segments, it doesn’t really change the fact that this is our cousin but in my mind it’s like they are more his cousin than mine and it makes me a little sad. It’s an illogical thought but my mind travels down these paths frequently.

    Now, here is my half 1st cousin once removed, we share 4% of our DNA, 301 cM across 11 segments, their shared DNA with my aunt is intereting, 223 cM across 10 segments, I share more DNA with them than they share with my aunt, I wonder if it means that my mother shares more DNA in common with this half sibling or maybe their other parent is somehow related to me through my father. This cousin’s parent is my half 1st cousin which means their grandparent is my mother’s half sibling.

    So here is a little chart showing piece of my family tree, I have way more aunts and uncles than is shown here, I just wanted to show where my cousins are located in the family tree.

    I wish some of my cousins on my father’s side would test so I can see how much DNa we share and what relatives they might be related to that doesn’t show up for me or my brother. They don’t seem to be interested in it but one can only hope.

  • Ancestry Pro Tools

    Ancestry Pro Tools

    Ancestry has really been on my last nerves for a while now. They did an update a while back where you can’t view your DNA relatives in common with someone or view their tree unless you have an active subscription, and I find that move left a sour taste in my mouth. Even without a subscription, I could separate my DNA relatives into groups to figure out how they are related to me. But it gets even worse – groups, even my custom groups that I had created over many years, are now paywalled. I swore that I wouldn’t pay for Pro Tools, swore that I would not pay for another subscription, but Ancestry kept enticing me with $1 subscriptions, and I cave every single time.

    In June, I decided that I would take the bullet and pay for Pro Tools. I parted with my €11.25 very reluctantly. Oh, I was punching the air and saying if it wasn’t worth it, I would be so mad. I’m even more pissed off that it has proved very useful. The one feature that I bought this subscription for was the Advanced matching. Basically, it does what 23andme and MyHeritage both do; it shows you the cM your DNA match shares with your matches in common and how they are possibly related to those matches. Angry, I am so angry because it immediately proved that my theory about a half-second cousin was correct. I had guessed at the connection to our shared DNA matches, but I really did not know how much DNA she would share with our shared matches, and now I know.

    I actually wrote a post about this match and how I went about proving that she was a half-second cousin. I just have the information about how much DNA she shares with my known half-second cousin 2x removed.

    Here’s the post if you haven’t read it: Detective Lynnette and the Case of the Mysterious DNA Relative

    I want to say I don’t know if I will renew, but I am still undecided because I have not done everything I wished I could do with this new tool, and I will no doubt continue to get more DNA relatives and I’ll need to figure out how they are related to my other matches. I will probably stagger my subscription because I cannot pay for this every single month.

  • Finding Sarah Holm

    Finding Sarah Holm

    If there is one ancestor who has evaded all my research skills it is my 2x great grandmother Sarah Holm, the amount of evidence !i have that Sarah did exist is very minimal, five pieces of primary records, I have tried to look forward but couldn’t find her in any record after 1920, I have tried going backwards but hit a brick wall in 1908.

    She is truly one of the most elusive people I have had to research and I can’t help but ponder, just  who are you Sarah? Were you hiding from someone or just didn’t know your correct age?

    Let’s go over everything I currently have, starting with the 1908 baptism record of my great uncle Harold Olanzo Smith. Harold was born on November 14, 1908 to Michael Smith of Tortola, British Virgin Islands and Sarah Holm of St. Thomas, Danish West Indies. Michael was 38 while Sarah was 33 at the time of Harold’s birth.

    Harold Smith’s baptism line 286

    1911 Census

    In 1911, Sarah lived in Mandenberg which was located in New Quarter on St. Thomas, she was 35 years old and worked as a Coal Worker and had two children, Harold 2 years old and another child identified as a boy with no age given.

    Sarah and children located on the bottom

    In 1914, Sarah gave birth to my great grandfather Alfredo Alexander Boyles also known as Alfredo Pedrito Boynes. Alfredo was born on May 26, 1914 to Joseph Alexander Boyles and Sarah Holm, Joseph was 45 years old and Sarah was 35, here is where the age discrepancies begin, in 1911 Sarah was 35, there is no way she was still 35 a whole 3 years later.

    Alfredo Boyles’ baptism line 46

    Sarah gave birth to my last great aunt in 1916. On November 12, 19166, Sarah and Joseph had another child, the baptism record lists the child as being male and named Arthur but on the left hand side there is a remark about the child actually being female. Joseph was 42 years old and Sarah was till 35 years old. Even more interesting Agatha later on gave her birth date as January 14, 1917 which was the date she was baptized.

    Agatha Boyles’ baptism line 2

    The last piece of primary source I could find, the 1920 Census, fun fact the 1920 Census was actually taken in 1917 up to 1918 so the dates are almost always wrong, sometimes I come across people with the right birth year but it’s mostly off by two years. In 1920, Sarah was living in Altona, which was located on the Southern East section of the island. She was 40 years old and living with three children, Mary J Griffith 11 years old, Agatha Boyles 1 years old, and Alfredo Boyles 3 years old. I’m not sure where Harold was at this time.

    Sarah and children located on the bottom

    An interesting piece of information I came across recently gave me some more clue to who Sarah might have been, this piece of information was an interview Mary Jane did when she was 99 years old. On October 9, 2004, In an interview with the St. Thomas Source, Mary Jane spoke about her life, how she met her husband and what she remembered of the day the islands were sold to the United States. She spoke about how her father was a carpenter, her mother grew vegetables to sell, Mary Jane states that she was the oldest of four children and was born on May 10, 1905 in Park Yard. I have not been able to find any baptism records to confirm this date nor do I have any clue as to where Park Yard might have been on St. Thomas.

    I’m afraid the only way I will get any answers is through DNA but Mary Jane had no children, I’m uncertain if Agatha had children, none of my known cousins on my grandmother’s side of the family has tested and none show any signs of being interested. I have one grandchild of Harold’s but there are very few connections, it did lead me to the grandchild of my grandmother’s half sister which also lead me to the NPE I discovered and posted about before Detective Lynnette and the Case of the Mysterious DNA Relative, this mystery cousin has a few relatives in common but I have not been able to make any connections between her tree and the other matches, if I could find a match betwen thm then I can find the connection to me as well.

    I guess I will be back to looking through my DNA relatives, those of my brother and those of my father as well.

  • Ancestry Updated Caribbean Communities

    Ancestry has released an update for their Communities in the Caribbean.

    I received an email telling me that I had two new Communities.

    As we add people to our database and keep developing the science behind AncestryDNAⓇ, we’re able to continue adding new communities to provide more insight into your family story.

    With more communities from African American Communities and Afro- Caribbean Communities, you could uncover new connections between your family story and other parts of the world.

    Email from Ancestry

    I couldn’t really tell you what they added because I haven’t been keeping an eye on the different communities just the two I had. They did remove the Afro-Bahamians and Afro-Bermudians which didn’t apply to my family history.

    I really didn’t notice what was updated at first but then I realized, they added Dominica.

    I was curious so I went through the feature where you can compare Communities with your DNA Relatives and saw that they also added Virgin Islands but I didn’t receive it. Which makes no sense to me as my father and his maternal line is from the Virgin Islands and has been for generations. I myself was born in the Virgin Islands and most of my DNA Relatives are from the Virgin Islands and have family still there.

    It is very similar to 23andme not assigning Saint Barthélémy to either my father, myself or our many cousins with ties to St. Barts.

    I guess all I can do is wait for their next update and see if either my brother or myself gets assigned to the Virgin Islands Community.

  • Detective Lynnette and the Case of the Mysterious DNA Relative

    Detective Lynnette and the Case of the Mysterious DNA Relative

    Let me tell you about this Mysterious DNA relative in my brother’s Ancestry list that haunted me for a few years.

    Mystery DNA Relative

    Shared DNA: 66 cM across 6 segments

    Unweighted shared DNA: 73 cM

    Longest segment: 28 cM

    This was a fairly close relative but she did not match with any of our other relatives, no matches with the hundreds of relatives on our grandfather’s side so I could cross that side out. No matches with our maternal matches so she wasn’t related to our mother. No matches with our father’s maternal grandmother’s relatives so that only left Alfredo who I wasn’t sure was our real great-grandfather because of the lack of DNA matches.

    The tree was no help because everyone up to grandparents was Private so I had no clues to go by but this was a mystery I was determined to solve.

    By chance, I happened to see this same relative on MyHeritage with a more open tree, and going through the tree I immediately noticed that her maternal grandparents were not from the Virgin Islands and I did not recognize any of the names. I started working on a mirror tree and everyone was born in the USA so I crossed out her mother’s family as being the connection, her father was Private but his father was not, it was just a name but one I know from the Virgin Islands.

    I was intrigued.

    I knew the last name but not the first name so off to Familysearch and Ancestry to do some searches, I was coming up empty, even looking through my DNA relatives I didn’t get any other matches with this surname in their tree, what could this possibly mean?

    It was scratching at the back of my mind but I didn’t want to answer it just yet, I wanted solid proof and that came a few months after I did my own DNA test at Ancestry, this match still was the only person connecting to both me and my brother until she matched with one other person.

    The New Match

    Shared DNA: 98 cM across 5 segments

    Unweighted shared DNA: 98 cM

    Longest segment: 38 cM

    This new match had a surname I knew but couldn’t place, she was instrumental in me finally connecting the mystery match to the tree and our family but the name was aggravating me with its illusive trail until I went back over my tree looking at the children of my great-grandfather Alfredo. There it was the name that was flirting with me, my great-aunt, the half-sister of my grandmother had married a man with the name of the new match. The new match was the granddaughter of my great-aunt.

    So if the mystery match also matches the granddaughter of my great-aunt that can only mean one thing, she was also a descendant of my great-grandfather Alfredo, but how? The last name of her grandfather, her grandfather was the full sibling of my great-aunt, they shared the same mother instead of being half-siblings like they were raised. So her grandfather was my great-uncle and that made her my half-second cousin.

    I honestly wondered if I should have even attached her grandfather to Alfredo but it seemed to me that maybe she was searching for her relatives, nobody takes a DNA test and uploads to multiple sites just for the fun of it. Oh yes, I forgot to mention I also found her on Gedmatch. So I put the information in my tree with the DNA connection and hoped she would see it and it would help.

    I have to admit though, Alfredo’s parents are still giant mysteries to me and I am no closer to cracking that particular nut just yet. I’m hopeful but the matches on that line are very few and far in between. At present count, I have just 3 matches excluding my brother. The two in this post and the granddaughter of Alfredo’s half-brother. With so many half connections is it any wonder that the DNA connections are on the smaller side?

  • Agnes Ancita Bastian

    Recently I was able to fit a missing piece into my puzzle thanks to a stranger on FamilySearch.

    For so many years I’ve been searching for proof that my great aunt Agnes Bastian was the daughter of Casper and the full sister of Ann Loratia Bastian but that pesky baptism record eluded me for so many years, no matter what combination of names or dates I put in I just could not find that baptism record. That is until I went onto FamilySearch after a little break and saw that someone attached a document to my great aunt, I was intrigued, usually, I am the one finding records and connecting them to other people’s relatives. I wasn’t convinced even if the names sounded similar, I had never heard the middle name Ancita before so I took a closer look at the record, and there it was.

    “Virgin Islands US, Church Records, 1765-2010”, database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:6ZF3-9558 : 29 December 2021), Agnes Ancita Bastian, 1918.

    Agnes Ancita Bastian was born on October 21, 1917, and baptized on January 15, 1918, the daughter of Caspar Bastian and Maud Hinds.

    Before this record popped up all I had to go by was the1930, 1940, and some travel records which unfortunately did not give her birthdate just her age and an estimated birth year which said around 1917.

    So now I have confirmed that Agnes and Ann Loratia Bastian; Ann was born on December 24, 1914, and baptized on February 6, 1915, were both the daughters of Casper Bastian.

    St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, Slave and Free People Records, 1779-1921, Ancestry.com

    There is an older sister, Esmeralda Bastian who was born on October 29, 1911, according to her baptism record but no father is recorded, given that Ann and Agnes followed after I assumed that Casper was also her father but I have no proof.

    I guess I will just have to continue searching and hope that maybe another kind soul will stumble across it and link it for me again.

  • Is knowing your Maternal Haplogroup helpful?

    It depends.

    In my father’s case, because he was adopted and we don’t know much about his family, matches on the X are pretty helpful for me.

    In my case they aren’t very useful because I have two Xs and any match on my X will need thorough research to figure out which side of the family this match comes from. I inherited an intact X from my father which is a recombination of his mother’s mother and her father. I also got a recombined X from my mother. Let’s take a little look into what this will look like in terms of DNA relatives.

    Matching with my father.

    As you can see, I share 50% DNA with my father including the X.

    We have different Maternal Haplogroups.

    Even though we share an X we don’t have the same Maternal Haplogroups because it is inherited strictly from the mother. My Maternal Haplogroup is L1b which came from my mother, her mother, her mother, and so forth. My father’s Maternal Haplogroup came from his mother.

    Matching with my maternal aunt.

    This match is my maternal aunt and as you can see I share 25% DNA with her including an X, in case you didn’t notice it’s not an intact X because I inherited DNA that my aunt didn’t.

    Sharing the same Maternal Haplogroup.

    Because this is my maternal aunt, the fact that we share the same Maternal Haplogroup tells me that she shares the same mother as my mother. I can also look at the number of cMs we share and 25% indicates a full aunt meaning she shares both parents with my mother.

    Matching with my mother’s first cousin.

    Here’s my match with my mother’s first cousin, we don’t share an X because he inherited his X from his mother and I’m not related to his mother. This tells me that I’m related through his father who was the brother of my grandmother.

    We don’t share the same Maternal Haplogroup.

    The interesting thing about this cousin is the amount of DNA we share. I thought I had just inherited more DNA from my grandmother than I thought but I recently learned that my grandparents were possibly related. I have not found any actual evidence that this is true but like most Islands Dominica is small and it shouldn’t surprise me that there could be some endogamy going on.

    I hope this was helpful in understanding how Maternal Haplogroups can help you in your genealogy research.

  • New Ancestry DNA update plus SideView

    I literally just received my Ancestry results and already they have been updated. If you hadn’t read my post talking about my Ancestry DNA results you can find them here My Ancestry DNA Results!

    Now let’s get into my new percentages and whatnot, but first what is Ancestry SideView?

    Ancestry SideView is simply Ancestry trying to tell you what DNA you inherited and which parent it came from, contrary to what people may have you think it is not the first of its kind, 23andme has done something for quite a while, you can find it in you Parental Inheritance Report and I’ve shared mine in a post before which you can read here Phasing My 23andme With My Father. As far as I can see the only difference is that with SideView you don’t need any parents to test but to me, it seems that might lead to some inaccuracies because I can’t fathom how they can pinpoint from which parent you inherited which gene if neither parent tested. I know this might seem to be biased because I have said again and again that I prefer 23andme to Ancestry but it just doesn’t seem logical to me, I am open to the fact that I might be wrong though.

    Here’s my Ancestry SideView, it really doesn’t seem all that accurate to me, just going off of what I got on 23andme where I am phased with my father, according to 23andme I inherited no French from my mother but Ancestry says I inherited 2%. Someone must be wrong and I’m leaning towards Ancestry being wrong just because my father is there to compare my results with.

    Now here’s my 23andme Parental Inheritance Report. The number here makes perfect sense when compared to my paper trail, I don’t really see how Ancestry arrived at the percentages they did.

    Before I forget here’s my update results from Ancestry. A bit of a shakeup, Nigeria decreased while Benin & Togo increased, Spain is completely gone or they changed it to Basque, Mali decreased, Ivory Coast & Ghane is increased, France increased, England & Northwestern Europe has decreased, I gained Senegal and most of the other changes are minor.

    Here are my results in comparison to my brother’s results, his France is still pretty tiny but it might just boil down to him not inheriting those specific genes.

    Ancestry has a lot of work to do if it wants to impress me, maybe including a chromosome browser or showing me how my DNA relatives are related to each other? 23andme has truly spoiled other tests for me.

  • Family Hidden in Plain View

    Have I just found Christina Chamberlain’s mother?

    That is the question that I am currently asking myself, have I in fact discovered the mother and sibling of Christina Chamberlain right there in a Census document that I have looked at several times before?

    The document in question is the 1870 Danish West Indies Census, here you can see Christina with Ancilla living next to her “father” Ludwick Chamberlain, and in the house above is Catherine “Caty” Simmons. I’ve seen the name Simmons before, in the trees of people who seem to have the same relatives as I do but they haven’t tested or maybe they have and we don’t match? Whatever it is I never ran across them in my brother’s DNA relatives and I have not seen them in mine.

    U.S. Virgin Islands Census, 1835-1911 (Danish Period)

    This record alone isn’t enough to say Hey! That’s her Mama, it was the other records that I found that made this even more compelling, here is Caty and Christina in the 1860 Danish West Indies Census, it lists Christina as her daughter.

    Danish West Indies, Denmark, Census, 1835-1911

    And here in the 1857 Census is Caty with Judy Powlis also known as Judith her other daughter and Judy’s son Carl.

    Danish West Indies Census, 1841-1901

    In the 1850 Census, I found Catherine, Judith, and Christina in the same place. I have not identified the other people yet, possible relatives? Maybe.

    Danish West Indies, Denmark, Census, 1835-1911

  • My Ancestry DNA Results!

    On March 5 I finally sent in my Ancestry DNA kit and anxiously waited on the results. So many things went through my head, but my biggest concern was “what if it failed?”.

    A valid concern since my 23andme test failed the first time, my fears were unfounded this time as my DNA Results were finalized on the 30th.

    It was weird looking at it because I was so used to my 23andme results and looking at my brother’s ancestry results, my own made zero sense to me.

    Lyly’s Ancestry DNA Results

    As a refresher here are my 23andme Results. After going through this process I still prefer 23andme over Ancestry. The only thing Ancestry really has going for it is the family tree attached to it but I’ve gone through all of this before in my post The Reasons why I prefer 23andme over Ancestry DNA.

    Lyly’s 23andme Results

    It’s really interesting watching my results compared to my brother, the differences in the genes we inherited are not only fascinating but it has helped me to verify some lines in our family tree. I have a few DNA relatives that he doesn’t have and they were the links I needed.

    Comparing my results to my brother’s results.

    The first line that I was able to confirm was my Grandfather’s paternal line, my brother had 0 matches from that line and it made me very curious, was it that nobody tested, or were there more nefarious reasons? Were we not actually LaPlace’s? I was going through the Thrulines and saw that I had two matches when I was expecting one. My brother is the match I was expecting and the second match was the Great-grandson of my Great-grandaunt, this person is my 3rd cousin and I have never heard of them, I knew that my Great-grandaunt had married into the Olive family and my Grandfather traveled to the US Virgin Islands to stay with her but my 3rd cousin’s last name I’ve never seen mentioned anywhere before.

    The second line I had confirmed was my Grandmother’s paternal line, same as above I was questioning why there were 0 relatives in my brother’s DNA relatives but it turns out he just didn’t inherit those genes while I did. I matched with the granddaughter of my Great-grandfather’s half-brother which makes her my Half 2nd cousin 1x removed, the DNA we share is also on the small side with only a 14% chance of being a Half 2nd cousin 1x removed but given the fickle nature of DNA inheritance, I’m just lucky to have even inherited any DNA from my 2nd Great-grandmother Sarah.

    Right now my focus is to see if hidden within my DNA relatives or even in my brother’s relatives there is a clue to who the father of our 2nd Great-grandmother Maud is. I am almost certain that it will be linked to the three relatives with the surname Hynes.